Horrible Clinique Moisture Surge 72-hour Auto-replenishing Hydrator or How I ruined my skin “proven” means

All articles

I’m so stressed out not long ago from Clinique and cosmetics in General.

The fact that cream Clinique Moisture Surge Extended Thirst Relief (the”old” part) I used 10 years, he really liked me and my skin, even smeared under your eyes — moisturize enough for everything. I use capricious skin, and this cream it was perfect.

And so, when the next bottle was over, I went for a new, not particularly paying attention to some change of letters on the Bank. Because the funds are similar, as they say, “confusingly”. Exactly the same packaging, banks, the gel-cream differs only in part from “Extended Thirst Relief” and “72-hour Auto-replenishing Hydrator”. I was sure that this is minimal branding, because what a normal manufacturer would think to remake the hit in a way that is completely invisible at closer examination? The unit not only their compilers creams, but and the market.

Avoid this tool, if you value your skin.

But changes have you noticed my skin, three weeks of hell being covered with boils, acne, podminkami, and other junk. I’m not exaggerating, it got so bad that I was tested for hormones, changed washing powder, then bought a new pillow, began to wash water only from bottles, to drink vitamins and do cleaning. I even sunglasses new bought — decided that the old were to pass harmful ultraviolet light and therefore wrinkles appeared.

And all this time, twice a day (about 72 hours moisture — this is nonsense and unfair advertising), I was poisoning my skin in this stuff, nothing to guessing, until, by a lucky chance, did not go on vacation, forgetting a jar at home.

See also  When the "hype" is justified Enough Collagen Moisture Foundation SPF 15 in shade 13

In the Spanish store I consultant cheerfully and persistently recommended “new cream”. What is he, say, new if 10 years of use. Here’s the whole truth about “fresh” composition and open. Re-buy this cream I certainly did not. I don’t know what it is so awfully affects the skin, but Thermus thermophilus ferment this kind of marketing game — “hardworking bacterium that lives on the bottom of the ocean blablabla”. That would let it bottom and left, instead of turning in the bottom of the face (and not only mine, I then read a lot of reviews about this new product failure).

My composition — with packing, bought in Britain.

What is even more strange — in some reviews I saw the part where the ingredients are in a different order, so don’t know whether to blame the insidious bacterium or banal silicone. Here is the second version of the composition:

WaterAquaEau, Dimethicone, Butylene Glycol, Glycerin, Trisiloxane, Trehalose, Sucrose, Ammonium Acryloyldimethyltaurate/VP Copolymer, Hydroxyethyl Urea, Camellia Sinensis (Green Tea) Leaf Extract, Silybum Marianum (Lady’s Thistle) Extract, Betula Alba (Birch) Bark Extract, Saccharomyces Lysate Extract, Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Water, Thermus Thermophillus Ferment, Caffeine, Sorbitol, Palmitoyl Hexapeptide-12, Sodium Hyaluronate, Caprylyl Glycol, Oleth-10, Sodium Polyaspartate, Saccharide Isomerate, Hydrogenated Lecithin, Tocopheryl Acetate, Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer, Glyceryl Polymethacrylate, Tromethamine, PEG-8, Hexylene Glycol, Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate, Disodium EDTA, BHT, Phenoxyethanol, Red 4 (CI 14700), Yellow 5 (CI 19140)

On the Russian site Clinique for the third set:

WaterAquaEau, Methyl Trimethicone, Phenyl Trimethicone, Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate, Dimethicone, Triethylhexanoin, Butylene Glycol, Titanium Dioxide, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Yeast ExtractFaexExtrait De Levure, Peg-10 Dimethicone, Lauryl Peg-9 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone, Alumina, Citrus Grandis (Grapefruit) Peel Extract, Betula Alba (Birch) Bark Extract, Saccharomyces Lysate Extract, Astrocaryum Murumuru Seed Butter, C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate, Glycerin, Sodium Myristoyl Sarcosinate, Acetyl Glucosamine, Caprylyl Methicone, Methicone, Polyglyceryl-6 Polyricinoleate, Disteardimonium Hectorite, Dimethicone Crosspolymer-3, Isopropyl Titanium Triisostearate, Lecithin, Laureth-7, Tocopheryl Acetate, Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate, Dimethicone/Peg-10/15 Crosspolymer

See also  The annual consumption. Mascara

And a bunch of lines, but the finale is beautiful “composition of the funds mentioned on the website may change or vary. For the most accurate information, please refer to the product composition specified on the packaging assets.”

And most importantly — the cream-gel with the “outdated” part of the Clinique Moisture Surge Extended Thirst Relief as mysteriously disappeared — whether it was withdrawn from sale, or just bought the same as I, yet tasted all the “charms” of a new composition. Searched in Spain, and in Russia. Especially predpriimchivyy sell on Amazon… for 73 euros. It is noteworthy that in Europe, it is 72-hour wonder why all the shops selling discounted 30-50%, although it is not a sales season in General, and novelties such huge discounts not normally do. In a hurry to get rid of?

Ordered from America three cans of “old”, waiting for the parcel. In the process of using going to find some new cream gel brand new and never remember about Clinique — I will be glad to councils, need moisturizer with a light structure, no oils, no silicones, no hylauronic acid or a minimal amount, not clog pores, does not cause pimples and does not dries the skin where it least expected.

No. A complete failure and a broken face.Causes acne, blackheads, boils.
Not moisturizing.
Significantly deepens wrinkles
False advertising — no “72 hours” of hydration is not happening.

Cost: £ 22 for 50 ml (in Russia is from 1700 to 2300 rubles)

Usage time: two terrible months

Will I still use: only at gunpoint

See also  New! Unique moisturizing jelly Clinique Dramatically Different Hydrating Jelly

Would recommend this tool: only your worst enemy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *